INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION FORUM (IAF, INC.) MULTILATERAL RECO-GNITION AGREEMENT (MLA)1 This Agreement is based on the results of evaluations carried out in accordance with the relevant rules and procedures of t- he intemational Acreditation Forum (IAF).2 The parties to this agreement are the accreditation bodies on whose behalf the Agreement has been signed (the “participating bodies”, collectively the “MLA Group”)3 Each participating body shall agree to abide by the terms and conditions of the MLA. Each participating body shall:(i) maintain conformance with ISO/IEC Gude 61, and related IAF guidance documents;(ii) ensure that all accredited bodies comply with ISO/IEC Guide 62 or ISO/IEC Guide 65, as approprite, and related IAF gui- dance documents.4 On the basis of the perceived equivalence of the systems for the accreditation of management system bodies and/or product certification bodies (hereinafter referred to as “systems”) o- perated by the participating bodies, each participating body will:(i) recognize the operation of the other systems – within the p- rograms as defined in this Agreement – as equivalent to its own;(ii) recommend and promote the acceptance of the certificates of conformity or certificates of competence within the recogn- ized scopes from the bodies accredited by the participating bodies as being on an equal basis with those of its own ac- credited bodies.5 Each participating body shall:(i) investigate all complaints initiated by a participating body resulting from certificates of conformity or certificates of competence issued by the bodies it has accredited within its accreditation programs;(ii) notify all other participating bodies as soon as possible of any significant changes that have occurred or will occur in its status, in the operational practices of its ysystem or in its accreditation programs;(iii) contribute as appropriate to the work of the MLA group;(iv) participate as appropriate in the meetings of the working group(s) of the MLA Group;(v) progvide auditors/assessors for the evaluation, re-evaluati- on and surveillance to the accreditaton programs of the MLA Group members and applicants;(vi) co-operate with other accrediation bodies so that the MLA may be extended;(vii) use all information in a confidential and professional ma- nner.6 if, in accordance with the relevant rules and procedures, it is agreed that an additional accreditation body that operates a system may participate in the agreement, an MLA Signature S- heet shall be signed by the new accreditation body and duly a- uthorized by the IAF Chair. The new signatory shall be added to the list in Annex A of this Agreement. The same procedure shall be followed if it is agreed that a participant to the A- greement may extend its accreditation programs.7 if a participating body wishes to eithdraw from this Agreement or withdraw parts of its accrediation program for any reason whatsoever, that body shall notify the other participating bo- dies to this Agreement in writing through the MLA management Committee not later than three months in advance of withdrawi- ng. upon withdrawal of a body or changing the extent of its a- ccreditation programs, that body’s MLA Signature Shee shall be obsoleted and the list in Annex A revised accordingly.8 Any amendment of the text of this Multilateral Recognition Ag- reement shall be made in accordance with the MLA Group rules of procedure.9 This Agreement consists of ten (10) Clauses plus an Annex lis- ting each participating body, along with the extent of its ac- creditation programs.10 This Agreement come into force on: 22 January 1998
- CNC Internal Grinder Machines
- CNC Two-Spindle Grinders Make Fast Work Possible for Metal Fabrication Workers
- CNC Cylindrical Electric Grinder
- What Are CNC Grinding Machine Benefits?
- Double-Sided And Single-Sided Grinders Offer Different Types Of Features
- CNC Cylindrical Grinding Machine
- CNC Internal Grinding Machines
- What Is A Centerless Grinder?
- What Are Vertical Grinders?
- An Overview Of A Surface Grinder